How to I-9 Remote Hires

Here’s the latest addition to our continuing series of educational videos:
Form I-9 Best Practices for Remotely Hired Employees

How to avoid the 5 common mistakes when completing the Form I-9 for remote hires. Tracker Corp’s Brian Fancher explains the best way to work with a Notary Public and an employer representative for onboarding employees who are unable to visit your Human Resources dept. to complete the I-9 form.

Disclaimer: The content of this post does not constitute direct legal advice and is designed for informational purposes only. Information provided through this website should never replace the need for involving informed counsel on your employment and immigration issues.

To learn more about how I-9 Compliance Software can help you comply with Form I-9 and E-Verify requirements, click here.

Share this with your network: Facebook Twitter More...

Guest Video Blog: “Fix It & Forget It” Preparation for Form I-9 Audits

[Editor’s Note: today’s post features guest blogger Angelo Paparelli, Partner and Certified Immigration Law Specialist (CA) at Seyfarth Shaw, LLP.]

Angelo Paparelli talks about how companies can best prepare for an ICE audit of their Form I-9s, by converting paper i9s to an electronic system (like Tracker I-9) and consulting a law firm with I-9 expertise, such as Seyfarth Shaw, LLP, to do a preliminary audit to fix any problems. Visit Angelo’s blog, Nation of Immigrators.

Disclaimer: The content of this post does not constitute direct legal advice and is designed for informational purposes only. Information provided through this website should never replace the need for involving informed counsel on your employment and immigration issues.

To learn more about how I-9 Compliance Software can help you comply with Form I-9 and E-Verify requirements, click here.

Share this with your network: Facebook Twitter More...

ICE Issues 1,000 I-9 Inspection Notices to Employers in June

The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) has issued yet another round of I-9 inspection notices to as many as 1,000 businesses located throughout the United States. Initially reported by the Associated Press, this announcement is another clear example of what has widely come to be known as the current administration’s “quiet immigration raid” policy. Instead of the high-profile immigration raids of years past, ICE has been focusing more on more on targeting employers (to the tune of 1000s) through the use of Form I-9 audits and investigations of their hiring practices.

Although ICE declined to name specific companies to be included in this round of audits, the AP is reporting that according to an ICE statement, “The inspections will touch on employers of all sizes and in every state in the nation, with an emphasis on businesses related to critical infrastructure and key resources.” You can read this Wall Street Journal article for additional insight here.

Recent I-9 Audits Numbers: The Trend is Clear

According to various reports, this latest batch of  inspections will bring the total number of ICE I-9 audits to 2,338 so far for this fiscal year, which already exceeds ICE’s record-breaking I-9 audit total of 2,196 from fiscal 2010 where average audit fines exceeded $110,000.

Recently, we attended a workforce symposium in the San Francisco Bay Area where representatives from ICE, the Department of Labor, and the Department of Justice all spoke about their agency’s efforts to determine whether businesses are violating U.S. employment laws by hiring unauthorized workers and what step their respective departments are taking to discourage such hiring practices. The ICE agent stated that I-9 audits are the key ICE initiative on this front. The agent also warned that one of the agency’s enforcement goals was to have the resources in place to handle 10,000 annual I-9 audits by the beginning of next year. Given ICE’s current pace, this goal seems achievable.

So how can you best prepare for a potential ICE audit?

First, companies should consider conducting a preemptive internal audit to get your I-9 house in order. Then analyze your results, initiate targeted training, and standardize your I-9 practices and procedures.

As you will probably find out, the paper Form I-9 process is error-prone and hard to centralize. Therefore, after conducting the internal audit you will want to implement a trustworthy I-9 software system to keep track of all the I-9 documents, deadlines, and work visa reverification requirements.

These steps are especially important for companies that have a large number of employees, high turnover rates, and/or multiple worksites. Of course, employers should always consider the need for involving informed counsel on your employment and immigration issues.

I-9 Auditing Overview

Over the past year, we published several articles on the I-9 audit process, including potential fines. For your convenience, here are links to these various resources.

Disclaimer: The content of this post does not constitute direct legal advice and is designed for informational purposes only. Information provided through this website should never replace the need for involving informed counsel on your employment and immigration issues.

To learn more about how I-9 Compliance Software can help you comply with Form I-9 and E-Verify requirements, click here.

ICE Announces Record-Breaking Worksite Enforcement Statistics

Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano and ICE Director John Morton revealed that in fiscal year 2010, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) enforcement numbers climbed to historic high numbers. This surge included a 500% increase in penalties from worksite enforcement actions, a nearly two-fold increase in I-9 audits (2,200), a record-breaking 180 criminal prosecutions of employers and the debarring of more than 97 businesses (compared to 30 last FY). Average fines exceeded $110,000.

John Morton, ICE Director

John Morton

ICE Director John Morton said that enforcing worksite laws not only promotes fairness in the workplace, but it also substantially reduces the incentive for aliens to enter the United States illegally.

“We will continue to enforce the law in a firm, sensible manner,” said Morton.  “And we will do it based on a rational set of priorities–priorities that focus on criminals, unscrupulous employers and those who game the system–priorities that promote public safety, border security and the integrity of our immigration system.”

So, why is this important?
Well, with the current economic climate and views on immigration, these statistics are the clearest example of what people are calling the Obama administration’s “quiet immigration raid” policy. Instead of the high-profile immigration raids of years past, ICE has been focusing less on rounding up illegal workers and more on targeting unscrupulous employers through the use of Form I-9 audits and investigations of their hiring practices.

As we previously reported, ICE released a worksite enforcement memo which details the most common reasons why a company might receive an audit, as well as who can be targeted.  Frequently, ICE investigates companies based upon an employee or public whistleblower complaint.

Employers located in nuclear power facilities, airports and surrounding companies, and companies located in landmark buildings are also going to be targeted. ICE will also pursue high turnover industries, such as retail and food service. Lastly, it’s now possible that the audit happened completely by chance – perhaps simply because of where your company is located.

So how can you best prepare for a potential ICE audit?
First, companies should consider conducting a preemptive internal audit to get your I-9 house in order.Then analyze your results, initiate targeted training, and standardize your I-9 practices and procedures.

As you will probably find out, the paper Form I-9 process is error-prone and hard to centralize. Therefore, after conducting the internal audit you will want to implement a trustworthy electronic management system to keep track of all the I-9 documents, deadlines, and work visa reverification requirements.

These steps are especially important for companies that have a large number of employees, high turnover rates, and/or multiple worksites. Of course, employers should always consider the need for involving informed counsel on your employment and immigration issues.

Disclaimer: The content of this post does not constitute direct legal advice and is designed for informational purposes only. Information provided through this website should not act upon it without consulting legal counsel as individual situations and facts may vary.

Practical Implications of the DHS Final Rule on Electronic Form I-9 Signatures and Storage

guest blogger2

Editor’s Note: We are pleased to introduce two respected experts in the field of Immigration Law and I-9/E-Verify compliance as our guest bloggers for today’s post, Robert Loughran and Susan Kelly of FosterQuan, LLC. Their post continues our coverage of the DHS final electronic I-9 rule released last week.

On July 22, 2010, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published a final rule amending the June 2006 interim regulations relating to signatures and storage of electronic Forms I-9.  In light of this final rule, we wish to share with employers who have electronic Form I-9 verifications systems, or those employers who are considering moving to an electronic system, some of the practical implications that the final rule has on using an electronic system for Form I-9 completion and storage.

First, the final rule clarifies that the employer has three business days to complete Section 2 of the Form I-9, where information is recorded relating to the employee’s identity and work authorization, as well as the employee’s date of hire, the employer’s certification signature, and the business name and address.  This modification reduces the confusion previously created by the instruction that the form be completed “within three days.”  Thus, because the final rule makes clear that only business days will be counted, most employers need not count weekends or federal holidays when determine its Form I-9 completion deadlines.  Retailers and other similarly situated employers may still be held responsible for weekends and holidays if those days are ordinarily “days on which the employer conducts business” pursuant to 1997 INS guidance.

What the final rule does not address on this topic is when the clock starts on these three days.  Recent guidance from DHS’ U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) instructs employers not to count the day of hire as Day 1 in this calculation. Therefore, if an employee starts work on Monday, the third business day would be Thursday according to this recent interpretation.  Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE), the enforcement branch of DHS, has recognized this policy, albeit not in any officially published guidance.  Until there is consistent guidance relating to the three day clock, employers may want to take the more conservative approach of completing the Form I-9 within three days of hire, counting the first day of work as Day 1.

paper vs electronic

Paper or Plastic? or both?

Another point the final rule raises is that employers may use paper or electronic systems, or a combination of the two, for Form I-9 completion and storage.  This provides an employer with flexibility to use an electronic Form I-9 system in certain company locations while maintaining paper records in other locations.  In some instances, there may be remote hiring sites that do not have the logistics worked out for a company representative or agent to certify the genuine-ness of the documents being presented resources for an electronic Form I-9 system.  Those sites could continue using paper Forms I-9, and the company has the choice as to whether those paper Forms I-9 ultimately get stored in the electronic system.  For a variety of business and logistical reasons employers may elect to leave historic Forms I-9 for terminated employees in paper form and move forward electronically as they are able.  There also instances where independent business units are ready for electronic records at varying times, and this new rule reinforces the concept that the record keeping need not be simultaneously electronic company-wide.  Those paper forms could be filed and cataloged in cabinets or boxes according to the proper destruction date or they can be digitized, linked and calendared into HR software for electronic management at any time the employer chooses.

What is The Government Going to Want to See?detective

The final rule clarifies the audit trail requirements such that an electronic Form I-9 system need not include every time a Form I-9 is viewed or accessed, but it must track any:

  1. creation,
  2. completion,
  3. alteration,
  4. update, or
  5. other modification

of a Form I-9 by recording:

  1. the date of access,
  2. the identity of the individual taking the action, and
  3. the particular action taken.

Many of the leading electronic Form I-9 software tools are designed to create an audit trail compliant with these standards, but not all systems are created equally.  Form I-9 tools included in packages designed for other human resources functions may not have this level of sophistication.  Employers should ensure that any electronic system being used or considered meets this standard to ease the burden of creating such an audit trail manually.

Employers must ensure that their electronic Form I-9 storage method contains an indexing system that is comparable to a reasonable hardcopy filing system.  This standard replaces the former regulation requiring that the system permit searches by any data element in the Form I-9.  This deletion allows employers more flexibility in the cataloging of Form I-9 records.  Again, the more advanced software systems will generally allow searches by any data field, including the employee name, birth date or Social Security Number.  However, some employers may wish to store copies of all Form I-9s electronically in a simple .pdf format without using an electronic software for data entry.  So long as these electronically saved images of the Forms I-9 are indexed according to one or more reasonable data fields, the employer will be compliant with this standard.  The final rule also makes clear that these records may be stored in a separate Form I-9 file or as part of other employee records.

Can Paper Receipts Result in Carelessly Discarded Personal Data?

Lastly, DHS addressed the requirement that electronic Form I-9 systems be capable of printing a transaction record that must be given to the employee at the time of Form I-9 completion.  Commentators in the interim period argued that this requirement fundamentally undermines the conversion to a paper-less system, whereby paper resources are saved and data is safely secured in a centralized, secured location.  A transaction receipt akin to a copy of the Form I-9 itself circulates sensitive employee information that could be used for identify fraud.  DHS argued that the receipt allows for confirmation of the accuracy of the record and is a proactive defense for employers if errors are later discovered on the form.  It is interesting to note that DHS does not require that employees be given a receipt when a paper Form I-9 is completed, even though a paper Form I-9 is perhaps even more vulnerable to error as there are no data checks being performed.

DHS did modify the regulation in part, however, by only requiring that a receipt be provided when an employee requests it.  In addition, the receipt need not be issued at the time of the transaction so long as it is provided within a reasonable time, and it may be transmitted rather than printed.  Thus, the final rule greatly reduces the burden on employers and company resources to produce a receipt for every Form I-9 that is completed.  When requested by the employee, the employer may also send the receipt electronically via secured email, rather than print a paper copy that could be carelessly discarded, misplaced or otherwise fall into the wrong hands.  Because the final rule does not elaborate on the type of receipt that must be provided, employers may consider drafting a receipt for company use as an alternative to printing a copy of the Form I-9.  A receipt that provides the employee name, date of completion and certification that all information entered was true and correct could satisfy the receipt rule without opening the door to identity fraud and scrutiny of company hiring practices.  Like all Form I-9 practices, consistency is crucial, and any policies should be adopted company-wide for all employees.

Form I-9 Electronic Regulations Finalized

TrackerLawBooksZoomThe Department of Homeland Security (DHS) recently published final regulations that amend interim rules promulgated in June 2006 which govern electronic signatures and storage for employers who complete and retain the Form I-9 in an electronic format. The Final Rule affirms that employers can complete, sign, scan, and store the Form I-9 electronically (including an existing Form I-9).  DHS also provides much needed clarification on certain technical requirements including more options for data compression, fewer storage requirements, and more options for storage systems, among others.

The follow is a summary of the key changes made by this Final Rule:

Employers must complete a Form I-9 within three business (not calendar) days. As we reported, USCIS recently provided clarification on when employers should start counting.

Employers may use paper, electronic systems, or a combination of paper and electronic systems. This clarifies that an employer may choose whether or not they want to create digital images or data of their historical paper I-9 forms when converting to an electronic I-9 system.

Employers may change electronic storage systems as long as the systems meet the performance requirements of the regulations, including accessibility and the ability to produce a reasonable facsimile or copy of the I-9.

Employers need not retain audit trails of each time a Form I-9 is electronically viewed, but only when the Form I-9 is created, completed, updated, modified, altered, or corrected.

Employers may provide or transmit a confirmation of a Form I-9 transaction, but are not required to do so unless the employee requests a copy.

The final rule also makes technical and conforming amendments to the regulations including the requirement that an electronic I-9 storage system be searchable “by any data element,” requiring only an indexing system that “permits the identification and retrieval for viewing or reproducing of relevant documents and records maintained in an electronic storage system.”

At first glance, these are welcomed changes that remove some of the roadblocks that may have kept employers from adopting an electronic I-9 system as part of their I-9 compliance program. Employers who are ready to switch to an electronic I-9 solution should make sure the system they adopt meets and exceeds the requirements in the Final Rule, such as Tracker I-9 .

More information about I-9 forms and Employment Eligibility Verification is available on the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services website at www.uscis.gov/I-9. For further guidance on the electronic signing and storage of the I-9 and to review the final rule in its entirety please visit the amendment as published in the Code of Federal Regulation.

Disclaimer: The content of this post does not constitute direct legal advice and is designed for informational purposes only. Information provided through this website should never replace the need for involving informed counsel on your employment and immigration issues.

E-Verify Releases Q&A Discussing TNCs and Employee Rights

Earlier this week, E-Verify released a lengthy Q&A document which addresses questions posed during a DHS-sponsored webinar held last September.  While many of the questions (and answers) are repetitive, there are some useful pointers concerning E-Verify setup, use, and the TNC process. What follows is a brief synopsis of the most useful Q&As along with this author’s comments.    

E-Verify Setup

Q1. When posting the two required posters (E-Verify and Right to Work) is it required that both English and Spanish posters be posted?

A1. Answer: As a participating Employer, you are required to post the English and Spanish notice provided by DHS indicating your company’s participation in the program, as well as the Right to Work Poster issued by the Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices. Both of these notices must be clearly displayed in plain view at your hiring site(s) to inform prospective and current employees that your company is participating in the E-Verify Employment Verification Program.

Comment: E-Verify staff has also indicated that employers may post these electronically on their intranet or I-9 software, which is especially useful for remote hires.

E-Verify Daily Use

Q2. Are you supposed to print and keep your results from each search?

A2:  Employers are required to print the Case Details page from each verification performed and attach it to the employee’s Form I-9, or document the Case Verification Number at the top of the Form I-9.

Comment: if you are using an electronic I-9 software application with integrated E-Verify, make sure the system maintains the history for you, so you go totally paperless.

Q3. Will it be possible for me to be the only person in my company who enters information into the E-Verify program? We have lots of managers in remote locations, but I’d like to do all the verifying from our headquarters?

A3. Answer: Yes. Employers may verify on behalf of one or multiple hiring sites by enrolling in our Employer Access Method. However, we do recommend that you add at least one additional user in the event there are circumstances that prevent you from performing the employment eligibility verification within three days.

Comment: electronic I-9 software takes this a step further, allowing you to control not only managers but also entire worksites. This allows you to use electronic I-9s for your entire organization while gradually rolling out E-Verify participation.

TNC Issues  

Q4. How long does an employer have to notify an employee of a TNC?

A4: E-Verify does not place a specific deadline on notifying an employee of a tentative non-confirmation, however, we ask that the employee be informed as soon as possible so that the referral process may be initiated.

Comment: notifying the employee is an extremely important step, so the best practice is to do so immediately. When discussing the TNC with the employee, make sure all communications are handled privately.  

Q5. How long does an employee have to decide whether to contest the results?

A5. The amount of time given to employees to decide whether to contest is at the employer’s discretion. Employers are simply asked to initiate the referral process in a reasonable amount of time. If the employee decides not to contest or does not return in the time set by the employer, the case may be resolved as Resolved Unauthorized/Terminated.

Comment: while it’s important to give the employee some time to read the TNC, employers should set a deadline for a response in their company policy and make sure to apply it consistently.

Q6. If an employee does not want to contest a TNC can he or she remain employed?

 A6.  Yes. E-Verify provides employers with the option to resolve the case as “Resolved Unauthorized/Terminated” or “Employee Not Terminated” once employees receive an initial answer of  a tentative non-confirmation. Please note that if an employer selects Employee Not Terminated, this means that they will disregard the TNC and continue to employ the person without having initiated a referral to the Social Security Administration (SSA) or Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Additionally, if a Form I-9 audit determines that the employee is indeed without employment authorization, the employer will be subject to the penalties outlined in the Form I-9 Handbook for Employers.

Comment: despite this answer’s accommodating tone, this option should not be taken lightly. There are serious penalties for continuing to employ an undocumented worker, so you should always consult with legal counsel before making this choice.

How safe are your I-9 data files? Warnings issued after possible security breach at Texas-based I-9 vendor

On December 11, 2009, the state of Minnesota directed all of its agencies to stop using a Texas I-9 software vendor which state officials had hired to verify the work authorization of new employees. [Full article] The state notified approximately 500 employees that their personal data, including names, dates of birth and social security numbers, may have been accessible on the company’s web site. The state was using Lookout Services of Bellaire, Texas, to verify new hires’ U.S. employment eligibility through E-Verify.

The security issue came to light when Minnesota Public Radio was able to access state employee data on the software vendor’s web site without using a password or any encryption software. Allegedly, employee names, birth dates, social security numbers and hire dates were visible on the web site for every state agency using the service as well as a long list of private companies.

This apparent security breach serves as a reminder that protection of personal information does not depend on data encryption alone. For safety, all I-9 software user accounts should require complex passwords (not left blank). Ideally, each organization using a hosted SaaS (software as a service) solution should be allocated a physically separate database file rather than allowing it to be co-mingled with data from other organizations.

E-Verify announces new mailing address for photo tool case resolution

photo mail

E-Verify has announced a new address which must be used by employers when mailing photos to DHS for case resolution. The photo matching process in E-Verify occurs automatically when an employee presents a green card or employment authorization document. If the photo presented by the employee does not match the photo in E-Verify, employers are instructed to notify the employee, and if he/she contests, to send a copy of the photo document to DHS.

This can be accomplished in two ways: (1) the employer can scan and upload a copy of the photo document (file must be in GIF format and be no larger than 1.5 megabytes) or (2) send a copy of the photo along with the DHS referral letter to the following new address:

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
10 Fountain Plaza, 3rd Floor
Buffalo, NY 14202
Attn: Status Verification Office – Photo Tool

The E-Verify photo tool is currently available for both direct employers and designated agents (as of this month). The photo tool will also be made available to web services users who are using a third-party  electronic I-9 and E-Verify system, although there has been no requirement or deadline imposed by DHS for those employers to utilize it yet.

USCIS announces that current Form I-9 will remain valid beyond June 30

Today, the USCIS announced that employers can continue to use the current version of the Form I-9 (Rev. 2/2/09) beyond its expiration date of June 30, 2009. The Form I-9 is currently under review at the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and the USCIS has requested that it be approved without any substantive change. Once approved, a new Form I-9 will be posted on the USCIS web site with a new revision and expiration date. According to today’s press release, employers will be able to use either the revised version or the current version of the form.

Employers using an electronic I-9 system will be largely unaffected by these developments as long as their system has the required fields and data elements of the current I-9 form and can reproduce a legible hardcopy in the event of an audit.