E-Verify & I-9 News

ICE Director, John Morton

Tracker participated in the Second Annual Worksite Immigration Compliance Symposium which took place at Stanford Law School’s Rock Center for Corporate Governance on April 20^th, 2012. This Symposium featured many of the top authorities and influencers in Form I-9 worksite compliance, for an insightful day of panel discussions on best practices in compliance and auditing, enforcement and penalties, IMAGE participation, and more.

Today’s post is an introduction to as series of future articles that will share details from some of the key discussions in this Symposium. Here is a quick overview of the discussion points that we will cover in greater detail in the coming weeks:

Executive Ethical Compliance Training

Featuring Charles H. Kuck (Partner, Kuck Immigration Partners LLC) and Carl Hampe (Partner, Baker & McKenzie) and moderated by Charles M. Miller, (Principal, Miller Law Offices, and Co-author of Immigration Compliance Auditing for Lawyers), this panel addressed the keys to managing a successful and ethical compliance program, developing I-9 policies, manuals, and training, and private external auditing. Their discussion covered the things all I-9 administrators must know, using a complete compliance audit as a best practice to avoid liability exposure, the steps to follow for proper remediation, and the essentials of how to do a private audit.

Updates on the IMAGE Program

Sharon Mehlman (Partner, Larrabee, Mehlman, Albi and Coker, LLP) and Adam Wilson, Unit Chief, IMAGE, DHS, ICE) provided an update on the IMAGE program, the Penalty Assessment Policy, the Memorandum of Understanding, and details on the private audit and IMAGE membership. Moderated by S. Christopher Stowe, Jr. (Law Office of S. Christopher Stowe, Jr., Executive Director of Homeland Security Compliance Council and Co-author Immigration Compliance Auditing for Lawyers), this session clarified what an IMAGE audit looks like, leniency towards companies undergoing an IMAGE audit, and recommendations for conducting internal audits.

ICE Worksite Enforcement Policies & Programs

Rachel Ross (Section Chief of the Employer Compliance Inspection Center, Worksite Enforcement Unit Office of Investigations (ECIC), DHS, ICE) and Paul Virtue (Partner, Baker & McKenzie and former INS General Counsel) discussed the current basis for ICE policies. This session provided information on the INS Virtue Memorandum on Technical errors versus Substantive violations, planned changes to the ECIC, recommendations about Self Auditing procedures, and a discussion on the government’s position on electronic I-9 systems.

Immigration Compliance Requirements

Rachel Ross (ECIC) and Jennifer Sultan (Acting Special Policy Counsel, Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices,  Department of Justice) discussed best practices for large corporations, including their biggest tips on how to avoid fines and discrimination charges, OSC guidance for acting on No Match letters, documentation best practices, and preventing issues that would appear to constitute “constructive knowledge” or a pattern of practice.

Keynote Speaker, ICE Director John Morton

John Morton (Director, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security) was on-hand as the luncheon’s keynote speaker. Director Morton gave a history and background of ICE. He expressed the importance of employers adhering to proper hiring practices (warning that ICE will conduct 3,000 I-9 inspections this year. He also explained the benefits of participating in the IMAGE program (ICE Mutual Agreement between Government and Employers).

Look forward to more details

There was such a substantial windfall of information from this symposium, we look forward to sharing the insights from these discussions in our upcoming posts.

Disclaimer: The content of this post does not constitute direct legal advice and is designed for informational purposes only. Information provided through this website should never replace the need for involving informed counsel on your employment and immigration issues.

To learn more about how I-9 Compliance Software can help you comply with Form I-9 and E-Verify requirements, click here.

Share this with your network:

[Editor’s Note: today’s post is brought to you by guest blogger Bruce Buchanan, an immigration attorney in the Nashville, TN office of Siskind Susser PC.]

March was a busy month for the Office of Special Counsel (OSC) for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices, a division of the Department of Justice. It settled cases against Onward Healthcare, Indrescom Security Technology, and Ross Department Stores, who were each accused of immigration discrimination.

Onward Healthcare, a healthcare staffing company based in Connecticut, resolved allegations that the company posted discriminatory job advertisements on its home page and third party websites that limited its jobs to U.S. citizens. Over a one year period, thousands of Onward Healthcare’s job postings impermissibly limited applications to U.S. citizens, even though work-authorized immigrants, such as lawful permanent residents, asylees and refugees, should have been allowed to apply.

The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) generally prohibits employers from discriminating on the basis of citizenship status unless required by law, regulation or government contract. It was determined Onward Healthcare had no legal basis for its stated citizenship preference. Under the settlement agreement, Onward Healthcare agreed to pay $100,000 in civil penalties, to change its internal policies and manuals to reflect the INA’s protections, and to be subject to reporting and compliance monitory requirements for a period of three years.

The Indrescom Security Technology and Ross Stores settlements involved situations where the employers demanded more documentary requirements for permanent residents than U.S. citizens. Specifically, Ross Stores refused to honor a work authorization document and demanded a permanent resident card while Indrescom refused to accept a valid driver’s license and Social Security card and demanded a permanent resident card.

Per the settlement agreement, Ross Stores agreed to reinstate the charging party and pay $6,384 in back pay plus interest to the charging party and $10,825 in civil penalties to the United States. Ross Stores also agrees to comply with the law, to train its human resources personnel about employers’ responsibilities to avoid discrimination in the employment eligibility verification process and to be subject to reporting and compliance monitory requirements for 18 months. Similarly, Indrescom agreed to pay $7,000 in back pay to the charging party, train its human resources personnel and be subject to reporting and compliance monitoring requirements for three years.

The lessons to be learned through these settlements are do not limit you applicant pool to only U.S. citizens unless you have a government contract or similar situation which requires only U.S. citizens and do not demand the employee’s permanent resident card if they have already provided you with sufficient documentation to establish work authorization.

Disclaimer: The content of this post does not constitute direct legal advice and is designed for informational purposes only. Information provided through this website should never replace the need for involving informed counsel on your employment and immigration issues.

To learn more about how I-9 Compliance Software can help you comply with Form I-9 and E-Verify requirements, click here.

Share this with your network:

[Editor’s Note: today’s post was written by Delisa J. Futch, a Partner in Foster Quan LLP Austin office and past Vice President for Conference Planning and Publications for the State Bar of Texas Immigration and Nationality Law Section. This article was originally published in Foster Quan Immigration in the News.]

On March 27, 2012, U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services published a notice of proposed revision to the Form I-9 in the Federal Register. Most notably, the proposed form is two pages rather than one page, and the instructions comprise six pages instead of three. The form appears to be ready for “form-fill” and seems to facilitate electronic completion and retention, though both the form and the rules continue to permit manual completion and retention of the Form I-9. The proposed form is open for comment until May 29, 2012.

Detailed Instructions, Greater Clarity
Overall the modifications provide more detailed instructions for completion of the form, and greater clarity concerning the specific information required in each field. For instance, fields requesting specific numbers clearly illustrate the number of digits the required number should have. Additionally, the new form clarifies that employers must enter “the employee’s first day of work for pay (mm/dd/yyyy)” in Section 2. The current version of the Form I-9 requires completion of “the employee began employment on (month/day/year) ______”.

New Fields
Completely new fields include the request for additional employee contact information – e-mail address and telephone number – though completion of these fields is optional. The new form also contains an additional block of fields for entry of document numbers and expiration dates under List A. Additionally, at the top of the second page, the employee’s name must be re-entered.

Separate, Enumerated Employer Attestations
Other proposed changes relate to the employer attestation. The proposed form separately enumerates the following with respect to the attestation the employer representative must make when signing the Form I-9: “I attest, under penalty of perjury, that (1) I have examined the document(s) presented by the above-named employee, (2) the above-listed document(s) appear to be genuine and to relate to the employee named, and (3) to the best of my knowledge the employee is authorized to work in the United States.”

List of Acceptable Documents
Proposed changes to the List of Acceptable Documents are minimal. The proposed form clarifies as follows with respect to the presentation of a Social Security Account Number card:

“A card that includes one of the following restrictions, for example, is not acceptable: (1) NOT VALID FOR EMPLOYMENT; (2) VALID FOR WORK ONLY WITH INS AUTHORIZATION; (3) VALID FOR WORK ONLY WITH DHS AUTHORIZATION.” The form also refers employers to the Employer Review and Verification section of the form’s instructions for additional information regarding acceptable receipts.

The new, proposed Form I-9 is not yet effective, and employers should continue to use the current Form I-9, with a revision date of 08/07/09, expiring on 08/31/2012.

Disclaimer: The content of this post does not constitute direct legal advice and is designed for informational purposes only. Information provided through this website should never replace the need for involving informed counsel on your employment and immigration issues.

To learn more about how I-9 Compliance Software can help you comply with Form I-9 and E-Verify requirements, click here.

Share this with your network:

On March 23rd, 2012, the U.S. Justice Department announced that it reached an agreement with Ross Stores Inc ., who will pay more than $17,000 to settle a claim that the company had engaged in a pattern or practice of discrimination based on citizenship status while verifying employment eligibility at its store in San Ysidro, Calif.

The claim alleged that Ross Stores discriminated against an employee by refusing to hire her, improperly requiring her to provide the company with a green card, even though she presented a genuine employment authorization document (EAD) for Section 2 of the Form I-9.  More broadly, the department accused Ross of subjecting newly hired non-U.S. citizens to excessive demands for documents issued by the Department of Homeland Security, in order to verify their employment eligibility, but did not require the same of United States citizens.

In the settlement, Ross Stores, Inc. agreed to reinstate the employee and pay $6,384 in back pay plus interest. The retailer also agreed to pay the government $10,825 in civil penalties. Ross Stores also agrees to comply with the law, to train its human resources personnel about employers’ responsibilities to avoid discrimination in the employment eligibility verification process and to be subject to reporting and compliance monitory requirements for 18 months.

The anti-discrimination provision (§ 274B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. § 1324b requires employers to treat all authorized workers equally during the employment eligibility verification process, regardless of their national origin or citizenship status. This federal law specifically prohibits document abuse (unfair documentary practices during the Form I-9 employment eligibility verification process.

Disclaimer: The content of this post does not constitute direct legal advice and is designed for informational purposes only. Information provided through this website should never replace the need for involving informed counsel on your employment and immigration issues.

To learn more about how I-9 Compliance Software can help you comply with Form I-9 and E-Verify requirements, click here.

Share this with your network:

[Editor’s Note: today’s video post is brought to you by guest blogger Katie Minervino, Associate Attorney in the Immigration Group at Pierce Atwood LLP. Katie assists employers and employees in employment authorization needs and provides clients with support and guidance on employment verification requirements, best practices, and audit response.]

Disclaimer: The content of this post does not constitute direct legal advice and is designed for informational purposes only. Information provided through this website should never replace the need for involving informed counsel on your employment and immigration issues.

To learn more about how I-9 Compliance Software can help you comply with Form I-9 and E-Verify requirements, click here.

Share this with your network:

[Editor’s Note: today’s post was written by Kim Kiel Thompson, partner in the Atlanta office of Fisher & Phillips LLP and chair of the firm's Global Immigration Practice Group. Visit their Cross Border Employer blog.]

Disclaimer: The content of this post does not constitute direct legal advice and is designed for informational purposes only. Information provided through this website should never replace the need for involving informed counsel on your employment and immigration issues.

To learn more about how I-9 Compliance Software can help you comply with Form I-9 and E-Verify requirements, click here.

Share this with your network:

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Director Alejandro Mayorkas announced the final expansion of E-Verify Self Check at a press conference in Orlando on Thursday, Feb. 9. The announcement marks the expansion of the program to all 50 states, including Washington, D.C., Guam, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands and the Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands (Read the USCIS Press Release here).

Developed in response to a request by Congress to create a service through which U.S. workers could check their own employment eligibility status outside of the employer focused E-Verify process, Self Check can help take the mystery out of the E-Verify employment eligibility confirmation process. After the user enters a small amount of information, the Self Check service will check that information against various government databases to determine the user’s eligibility to work in the United States.  Self Check will then return one of three results: Work Authorization Confirmed, Possible Mismatch with SSA, or Possible Mismatch with Immigration Information. If any mismatches are found between the information provided to Self-Check and the governments records, the system provides instructions on what steps to take to try to resolve the issue.

Employers are warned not to use Self-Check to pre-screen the employment eligibility of new hires. If an employer or potential employer asks to see a Self-Check query to prove work authorization, individuals are instructed to notify the Department of Justice, Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices at 800-255-7688. Also, a positive Self-Check result does not guarantee that individuals will pass through E-Verify without issue at a later date. Self Check has the potential to benefit employees and employers by reducing the number of data mismatches during the E-Verify process  and thereby decrease the amount of time spent resolving those mismatches.  The Self-Check tool is available at www.uscis.gov/selfcheck.

Self Check’s initial launch in March 2011 was limited to a number of participating states to ensure that USCIS could provide an accurate and efficient service. Last fall, USCIS added an additional 16 states and also offered a Spanish version of Self Check.

Disclaimer: The content of this post does not constitute direct legal advice and is designed for informational purposes only. Information provided through this website should never replace the need for involving informed counsel on your employment and immigration issues.

To learn more about how I-9 Compliance Software can help you comply with Form I-9 and E-Verify requirements, click here.

Share this with your network:

[Editor’s Note: today’s post is brought to you by guest blogger Bruce Buchanan, partner-in-charge of Immigration Practice, King & Ballow, LLP.]

The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) issued Notices of Inspection (NOIs) to a number of employers on November 4, 2011. ICE will not release the number of NOIs, though it is believed to be about 500, or the names and locations of the businesses served with NOIs.

If your business was not targeted, count yourself lucky. If your business is served with a NOI, what should you do and what will happen during the inspection/investigation? Having represented clients in several ICE audits in past few years, here are my thoughts and insights.

The NOI, which begins the ICE audit, is hand-delivered by an ICE agent of Homeland Security Inspections (HSI) to the business with a demand to inspect the I-9 records plus other employment-related records, such as payroll records, Social Security no-match letters, and a list of related companies. An employer has three days to comply with the NOI and should never provide the requested records upon initial receipt of the NOI. Sometimes ICE is willing to provide more than three days, if requested. An employer should contact their immigration counsel immediately upon being served with a NOI.

During the period between the delivery of the NOI and the deadline to provide the I-9s and other records, the employer and immigration counsel have the opportunity to determine if all of the employees’ I-9s are in order and, if not, make any necessary corrections/additions plus determine whether all employees have proper work authorization. During these three days, the employer’s HR manager (or whoever is in charge of immigration compliance for the employer) and immigration counsel will be spending a lot of time together. You should delegate the gathering of non-I-9 related records to another management official besides the one in charge of I-9s.

ICE will then return to the employer’s facility and remove the I-9s and related records or the employer and counsel must hand-deliver them to the local ICE office. (Employers should always make copies of the I-9s before providing ICE with the original I-9s.) At this point, the I-9s are sent to an ICE auditor.

Following the audit, which may take 2 to 18 months, ICE will provide a Notice of Suspect Documents, if applicable. This notice lists the names of all employees who could not be authenticated as having valid work authorization. At this point, the employer must give notice, in writing or verbal, to each affected employee and provide him or her with an opportunity to correct any mistakes, provide proper work authorization documents, or assert ICE made a mistake. The employer then provides such documents or assertions to ICE for their review. If an affected employee does not comply, the employer should terminate the employee.

Moreover, if the employer terminates the affected employees after providing notice and an opportunity to provide new documentation, an employer will not be subject to any fines or penalties for knowingly employing unauthorized workers – unless ICE discovers other evidence that the employer was aware of the affected employee’s illegal status. The fact that the employer hired an illegal alien, who provided a false A number, permanent resident card, work authorization document or Social Security number, is insufficient to prove the employer knowingly hired any illegal aliens.

Thereafter, ICE will provide the employer with a Notice of Technical or Procedural Failures and the underlying I-9s that have such errors. The employer has 10 days to correct the technical errors. If they are correctable and corrected, ICE will not issue any fines for these violations.

The final step in the audit is a “Notice of Intent to Fine” for substantive and uncorrected technical violations and/or for “knowingly employing” illegal aliens. Additionally, “knowingly employing” illegal aliens’ charges carry possible criminal indictments. An employer has 30 days to agree to pay the fines, reach a resolution on the amount of the fines or challenge the determination before the Office of Chief Administrative Hearing Officer (OCAHO).

Before ICE comes knocking at your door, your business should develop an immigration compliance program, which includes a self-audit of your I-9s, training for applicable management, draft and implement immigration compliance policies, including whether to use E-Verify.

Disclaimer: The content of this post does not constitute direct legal advice and is designed for informational purposes only. Information provided through this website should never replace the need for involving informed counsel on your employment and immigration issues.

To learn more about how I-9 Compliance Software can help you comply with Form I-9 and E-Verify requirements, click here.

Share this with your network:

“U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) issued Notices of Inspection (NOIs) to various employers on Friday, Nov. 4. These inspections are designed to determine whether or not the businesses are violating U.S. employment laws by hiring unauthorized workers. The names and locations of the businesses will not be released at this time due to the ongoing nature of the inspections,” according to a statement released by the ICE public affairs department today.

So how can you best prepare for a potential ICE audit?

First, companies should consider conducting a preemptive internal audit to get your I-9 house in order. Then analyze your results, initiate targeted training, and standardize your I-9 practices and procedures.

As you will probably find out, the paper Form I-9 process is error-prone and hard to centralize. Therefore, after conducting the internal audit you will want to implement a trustworthy electronic management system to keep track of all the I-9 documents, deadlines, and work visa reverification requirements.

These steps are especially important for companies that have a large number of employees, high turnover rates, and/or multiple worksites. Of course, employers should always consider the need for involving informed counsel on your employment and immigration issues.

Disclaimer: The content of this post does not constitute direct legal advice and is designed for informational purposes only. Information provided through this website should never replace the need for involving informed counsel on your employment and immigration issues.

To learn more about how I-9 Compliance Software can help you comply with Form I-9 and E-Verify requirements, click here.

Share this with your network:

On November 4, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) announced that seven major employers in the U.S. joined IMAGE, the agency’s voluntary employment compliance program. These newly joined employers include Best Western International, Chick-fil-A, Inc., Hyatt, Kelly Services, Lexmark, Smoothie King and Toyota Motor Engineering and Manufacturing North America.

Here is a complete list of IMAGE partners.

IMAGE stands for “ICE Mutual Agreement between Government and Employers,” created to promote voluntary compliance and help companies ensure they are maintaining a lawful workforce.

To participate in IMAGE, companies volunteer to enroll in E-Verify, to follow written hiring policies that enforce I-9 compliance, and to engage in annual self-audits.  Furthermore, IMAGE companies agree to submit to an ICE audit of their I-9 employment eligibility forms. In return, ICE agrees to:

• Waive potential fines if substantive violations are discovered on fewer than 50 percent of the required Forms I-9.
• In instances where more than 50 percent of the Forms I-9 contain substantive violations, ICE will mitigate fines or issue fines at the statutory minimum of $110 per violation.
• ICE will not conduct another Form I-9 inspection of the company for a two-year period.
• ICE will provide information and training before, during and after inspection.

According to the ICE website, the idea behind the IMAGE program is for employers “to place an emphasis on self-policing in a company’s hiring practices. By following the prescribed steps of IMAGE, a company could lessen the likelihood of being found in violation of employment laws. IMAGE participation may be considered a mitigating factor in the determination of civil penalty (fine) amounts should they be levied. In addition, IMAGE membership can enhance your corporate image by associating your company with sound hiring practices, and helps to secure the homeland by reducing opportunities to inadvertently hire unauthorized workers.”

Clearly, participating in the IMAGE program is a significant commitment that carries real ongoing costs (annual internal audits, training) and potential costs (Form I-9 fines). While ICE has made an effort to “soften” the risk of being fined based on the Form I-9 inspection result, the fact that IMAGE is not offered as a safe harbor is one of the primary reasons employers are reluctant to participate in the program. For all of these reason, employers should consult with legal counsel before making a decision to enroll.

In light of some of the most recent ICE worksite enforcement statistics announced in October (see below), now more than ever employers should  consider strengthening their corporate employment eligibility verification compliance program.

In FY 2011, ICE:

• Conducted 2,496 I-9 audits, up from 503 in FY 2008
• Initiated 3,291 worksite enforcement cases, up from 1,191 in FY 2008
• Criminally arrested 221 employers, up from 135 in FY 2008
• Issued 385 Final Orders for $10,463,987 in fines, up from 18 Final Orders for $675,209 in fines in FY 2008
• Debarred 115 individuals and 97 businesses, compared to zero debarments in FY 2008

For more information on the IMAGE program, please visit: http://www.ice.gov/image/faqs.htm.

Disclaimer: The content of this post does not constitute direct legal advice and is designed for informational purposes only. Information provided through this website should never replace the need for involving informed counsel on your employment and immigration issues.

To learn more about how I-9 Compliance Software can help you comply with Form I-9 and E-Verify requirements, click here.

Share this with your network: