USCIS Publishes Second Draft of New, Proposed Form I-9 for Review and Comment

The NEW Proposed Two-Page Form I-9 with highlighted changes (see table of changes below). Click to enlarge.

As previously reported, on March 27, 2012, USCIS revealed an initial draft of a new Form I-9 for public review and comment. This first version was remarkably different than the current from. In addition to several new fields and an updated layout, most notably the form doubled in size going from one to two pages.

Reportedly, USCIS received of over 6,200 comments and suggestions on the initial draft, and recently USCIS published an updated version of the new Form I-9 with instructions that includes several changes to the first draft published back in May (see below). You can find more information about the newly proposed revisions to the Form I-9 here.

The new proposed Form I-9 is not yet effective, and employers should continue to use the current Form I-9, with a revision date of 08/07/09, until further notice.

USCIS welcomes your feedback on the new proposed two-page Form I-9. All comments should be submitted no later than  September 21, 2012 in order to ensure that they will be considered.

There are several ways to submit your public comments.

  • Submit your comment online at www.regulations.gov. Remember to indicate the e-Docket ID number “USCIS-2006-0068” in your comments.
  • Send an Email to uscisfrcomment@dhs.gov. Remember to include  “OMB Control Number 1615-0047” in the email subject line.
  • Mail your comment to the address below. Please be sure to indicate “e-Docket ID USCIS-2006-0068.

DHS, USCIS, Office of Policy and Strategy
Laura Dawkins, Chief, Regulatory Coordination Division
20 Massachusetts Avenue NW
Washington DC 20529

 

PROPOSED CHANGES TO FORM I-9

Section 1

 

1. Last and First Name Fields: The form now shows “Last Name (Family Name)” and “First Name (Given Name)”, rather than the reverse.

2. Maiden Name is now called “Other Names Used (if any)”. Per the instructions, “Provide all other names used, if any (including your maiden name).  Write N/A if you’ve not had other legal names.

3. Address – Must be a US address, except for border commuters from Canada and Mexico.

4. The Social Security Number boxes are now formatted to fit the requisite 9 digits.

5. Email Address and Telephone Number – New fields.  Optional, per the instructions, but not marked as such on the form.

6. A-Number vs. USCIS Number: The instructions note that the “USCIS number is the same as the A-number without the “A” prefix. Another clarification: Foreigners authorized to work can provide either the A-Number/USCIS Number OR the Form I-94 number.

7. Form I-94 Admission Number: find the admission number on Form I-94 or “as directed by U.S. Customs and Border Protection in connection with your arrival in the United States.”  - leaving room for future procedural changes.

8. Barcode: – A space for a 3-D Barcode has been added to page 1 and 2, along with   “Do not write in this space.” As of the time of this post, the purpose of the barcode is unknown.

9. The form now has two “Stop Sign” icons at the bottom of page 1, instead of “Go to Next page.”  This is to prevent employees from accidentally completing section 2.

 

Section 2

10. Includes words to make it clearer that an “Authorized Representative,” such as designated agent or notary, can act in an agent capacity in completing Section 2.

11. Moved the employee name fields (Last, First, and Middle initial) underneath the Section 2 heading and added the words “from Section 1” indicating that it is acceptable for the employer to enter this data.

12 Added new fields for the document title and issuing authority of second and third list A documents which often pertain to foreign employees with certain document types.

 

 

Section 3 and List of Acceptable Documents

Minor changes only, mostly related to formatting and clarification of the “Social Security Account Number card” restrictions.

 

Disclaimer: The content of this post does not constitute direct legal advice and is designed for informational purposes only. Information provided through this website should never replace the need for involving informed counsel on your employment and immigration issues.

To learn more about how I-9 Compliance Software can help you comply with Form I-9 and E-Verify requirements, click here.

USCIS Announcement: Continue to Use the Current Form I-9 for Employment Eligibility Verification

On August 13, 2012, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that, until further notice, U.S. employers should continue using the current version the the Form I-9 (Rev. 08/07/09), even after its expiration date of August 31, 2012.

To help determine if you are using the correct version of Form I-9, employers can also can also visit the “Which Form I-9 Should I Use,” page of the USCIS’ I-9 Central website.

The current version of the Form I-9 is  available on the forms section of the USCIS website (Title “Employment Eligibility Verification”,  Form Number “I-9″) .

In the announcement, USCIS states that the agency will provide updated information about the new version of the Form I-9 as it becomes available.

Disclaimer: The content of this post does not constitute direct legal advice and is designed for informational purposes only. Information provided through this website should never replace the need for involving informed counsel on your employment and immigration issues.

To learn more about how I-9 Compliance Software can help you comply with Form I-9 and E-Verify requirements, click here.

E-Verify Self-Check Launches on March 21, 2011

A free E-Verify Self-Check feature that allows individuals over the age of 16 to confirm the accuracy of their U.S. employment eligibility will go live on March 21, 2011 in selected states.  The E-Verify Self-Check (Self-Check) phase one roll-out will be available to individuals who currently maintain residency in Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Mississippi and Virginia, or the District of Columbia.  As initial testing and system improvements are made, it is expected that USCIS will expand Self-Check to other states, and eventually be available nationwide.

If the new feature works as expected, individuals will be able to use Self-Check in much the same way as employers use E-Verify, except that individuals will need to take extra steps to verify their own identity. After entering certain biographical information, an independent third party service is used to complete the identity verification process, and if successful, the user is redirected to Self Check to enter additional information in order to complete the employment eligibility check. Self Check will then return one of three results: Work Authorization Confirmed, Possible Mismatch with SSA, or Possible Mismatch with Immigration Information.

If any mismatches are found between the information provided to Self-Check and the governments records, the system will provide instructions on how resolve the issue. Below is a diagram of Self-Check workflow process (click on the image to enlarge).

Employers are warned not to use Self-Check to pre-screen the employment eligibility of new hires. If an employer or potential employer asks to see a Self-Check query to prove work authorization, individuals are instructed to notify the Department of Justice, Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices at 800-255-7688. Also, a positive Self-Check result does not guarantee that individuals will pass through E-Verify without issue at a later date.

If you are interested in learning more about the Self-Check process, USCIS has posted an E-Verify Self-Check Interactive Preview on its website.

UPDATE: New Employment and Travel Authorization Document Image

As we reported on Friday, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is now issuing employment and travel authorization on a single card for certain foreign nationals. Employers may accept this card as a List A document when completing the Employment Eligibility Verification, Form I-9.

As advertised, the new dual-purpose card looks nearly identical to the current Employment Authorization Document (EAD), except for a caption that reads “Serves as I-512 Advance Parole” as noted in the sample image on the left that we just obtained from the  USCIS Questions and Answers sheet recently posted on their website here.

USCIS to Issue New Employment and Travel Authorization Document that Employers may Accept for Employment Eligibility Verification

Today, USCIS announced that it is now issuing a new document that represents both employment and travel authorization for certain foreign nationals who have filed an Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status, commonly referred to as a “Green Card Application.” Previously, USCIS issued employment and travel authorization documents separately, and may continue to do so under certain circumstances as necessary.  According to the announcement, employers may accept the new work and travel authorization card as a List A document when completing Section 2 of the Form I-9.

Employers may accept the new card as a List A document

Unfortunately, the announcement did not include a sample image of the new card, although apparently it will look similar to the current Employment Authorization Document (EAD or Form I-766) and will include a caption that reads “Serves as I-512 Advance Parole” (click here to see a sample image of an EAD card). We will post an image of the new card as soon as it becomes available since Employers will want to become familiar with it for I-9 purposes.

There’s no doubt that this announcement raises important questions that remain unanswered. Specifically, in the context of the Form I-9 and E-Verify:

  • Will the new card be considered as a new List A document, or will USCIS simply treat it as akin to the EAD card?
  • When an employee presents this new document, what should employers write in as the “Document Title” on the Form I-9?
  • If the new card will be considered as a new List A document, when will USCIS publish the updated list of acceptable documents that’s found in the Form I-9 Instructions and the Handbook for Employer, Instructions for Completing Form I-9?
  • Will employers who participate in E-Verify be required to retain a copy of the new card and perform E-Verify photo matching?

We look forward to receiving the answers to these questions as well as additional guidance from USCIS that helps employers understand how the new work and travel authorization card impacts the complex Form I-9 and E-Verify process.

You can read the full USCIS announcement on their website, here.

New M-274 Handbook For Employers Fills Gaps in Form I-9 Guidance

Editor’s Note: Today’s post is brought to you by guest bloggers Susan McConn, Avalyn Langermeier and Kari Konikowski, of FosterQuan, LLC. All three authors are well known experts in the field of Immigration Law and I-9/E-Verify compliance.

The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) recently issued new guidance for employers on the Form I-9 process.  The Handbook for Employers (Rev. 01/05/2011), also known as the Form M-274, has been updated and revised to provide guidance to employers on how to complete the Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification.  The Form I-9 must be completed for every worker hired after November 6, 1986, regardless of whether the employee is a U.S. citizen or not.  The following is a summary of the changes found in the revised Handbook:

Employees with Temporary Protected Status (TPS), Pages 10 – 11

TPS is a temporary immigration benefit that allows foreign nationals from designated countries to reside and work in the United States for a temporary period of time.  The Department of Homeland Security may extend a country’s TPS designation and issue a Federal Register notice to automatically extend expiring Employment Authorization Documents for TPS beneficiaries.  Thus, a TPS beneficiary may choose to present an Employment Authorization Document that is expired on its face so long as it has been automatically extended.  The challenge to employers is how to determine whether a TPS beneficiary’s expired Employment Authorization Document is valid as a List A document.

The Handbook now provides guidance on how to identify a TPS Employment Authorization Document, how to determine whether the Department of Homeland Security has issued an automatic extension of expiring Employment Authorization Documents, and how to explain that the TPS status was extended on the Form I-9.

J-1 Exchange Visitors & F-1 Students, including F-1s Changing to H-1B Status (“The Cap Gap”), Pages 11- 16

The Handbook provides a detailed explanation on how to complete Form I-9 for those individuals in J-1 exchange visitor status (pages 11-13) and F-1 and M-1 student status (pages 13-15).  Additionally, the Handbook explains how to complete the Form I-9 for F-1 students who are changing status to H1-B and are eligible for a “cap-gap” extension of status and employment authorization.  The Handbook confirms that the student’s employment authorization will remain valid through September 30 of the calendar year for which the H1-B is filed, so long as the student’s H-1B status will begin on October 1.  Additionally, the Handbook advises that an employer must re-verify a student’s Form I-20.  The Form I-20 must show that  the cap-gap extension was endorsed by the student’s designated school official.  Re-verification must be done no later than October 1.

H-1B Employees Changing Employers (Portability), Page 17

The Handbook now states that an employee in valid H-1B status who changes (“ports”) to a new employer can begin to work with the new employer upon filing an H-1B petition with USCIS.  The prior 2009 version of the Handbook required the porting H1-B employee to obtain a Form I-797 Receipt Notice from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) prior to beginning work with the new employer.  This approach created considerable delay because it often takes USCIS weeks to issue the official Form I-797 Receipt Notice.

The current version of the Handbook explains that a porting H-1B employee may begin employment by presenting his or her Form I-94/ I-94A issued for employment with the previous employer, along with his or her foreign passport, as a List A document.  The employer should write “AC21” on the Form I-9, record the date that the new H-1B petition was submitted to USCIS in the margin next to Section 2 of the Form I-9, and attach documentation as specified in the Handbook. (If you use electronic I-9 software, make the annotation in the notes section of the I-9 record.)

Extensions of Status, Pages 17 and 18

The Handbook explains that an employee with a petition for extension of status timely filed before the employee’s work authorization expires is eligible for continued work authorization for up to 240-days beyond the expiration date of the authorization as long as the extension remains pending.  The Handbook provides a detailed explanation on how to complete the Form I-9 and the documentation to be attached for individuals in  E-1, E-2, H-1B, H-2B, H-3, L-1, O-1, O-2, P-1, P-2, P-3, Q-1, R-1 and TN status  who have timely filed extensions with the same employer.

Where an H-1B extension is timely filed and the extension remains pending, the employer should write “240-Day Ext.” and record the date the employer submitted the Form I-129 to USCIS in the margin of Form I-9 next to Section 2.  (Again, for electronic I-9 systems, makes these types of annotations in the notes section of the I-9 record.)

Additionally, the Handbook expands upon what documentation should be added to the Form I-9.  Previously, the employer was advised to attach only the USCIS Form I-797 Receipt Notice.  Now, the Handbook adds that the employer should retain the following documents with the Form I-9 in this situation:

  1. A copy of the new Form I-129 that was filed for the extension,
  2. Proof of payment for the filing of the new I-129, and
  3. Evidence that the new Form I-129 was mailed to USCIS.
  4. After the extension is filed, USCIS will issue a receipt notice (Form I-797(C)), which should also then be added and retained with the Form I-9.

When the extension of stay is approved, the employer should record in Section 3 the document title, number and expiration date listed.  The Handbook also adds that the employer must give to the employee the Form I-94A, which is evidence of the employee’s employment authorized nonimmigrant status.

Interruptions in Employment, Page 20

The Handbook now provides guidance to employers that are uncertain about whether a new Form I-9 is required after an employee has experienced a brief interruption in employment.  The Handbook provides examples of situations which include “continuing employment,” such as maternity or paternity leave, leaves of absence, transfer from one business unit to another business unit of the same employer, the same employer at another location, etc.  An employer is not required to complete a new Form I-9 in these situations so long as there is a reasonable expectation of employment at all times.

Electronic Retention of Forms I-9 and Documentation of Electronic Storage Systems, Page 24

The Handbook offers expanded guidance to employers that use paper, electronic systems, or a combination of paper and electronic systems to retain a Form I-9 (See our previous guest blog post on this important topic here).  Employers must follow certain guidelines should they choose to retain Forms I-9 in an electronic generation or storage system, and these guidelines are outlined in the Handbook.  One requirement is that an employer must maintain and make available upon request complete descriptions of the electronic generation and storage system and the indexing system that permits the identification and retrieval of documents and records maintained in the system.  Employers that are currently using an electronic retention system or contemplating the future use of an electronic retention system should review the information outlined in the Handbook and consult with immigration counsel.

E-Verify and Federal Contractors, Pages 19 and 35

The previous version of the Handbook offered guidance to employers regarding participation in E-Verify and the corresponding Form I-9 responsibilities, such as maintaining a photograph of a List B document.  The new version of the Handbook provides additional guidance to Federal contractors about their responsibilities under the amended Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) related to employment eligibility verification.  The Handbook explains that the regulation requires contractors with a federal contract that contains a FAR E-Verify clause to use E-Verify for their new hires and all employees (existing and new) assigned to the contract.  The Handbook also states that where an employee working for a FAR employer undergoes a name change and the employer chooses to verify existing employees by updating existing Forms I-9, then a new Form I-9 must be completed.

Questions and Answers Section, Pages 37 – 49

The Handbook has expanded upon its Questions and Answers (Q&A) section in an effort to provide clarification to employers in a variety of situations related to Forms I-9, including the following helpful information:

  • A Native American tribal document is acceptable as both a List B and List C document, and no other documents need be presented.  For a current list of tribes recognized by the U.S. federal government, employers may visit the website of the Bureau of Indian Affairs at www.bia.gov. A Certificate of Indian Status does not constitute an acceptable Native American tribal document and may not be accepted for Form I-9 purposes, (pages 38-39);
  • An employer may accept a Social Security Card that has not been signed as a valid List C document, (page 39);
  • An employee may present an unexpired Form I-94 card notated with work-authorized status in two situations: 1) as a List A document along with his or her foreign passport; or, 2) as a List C document demonstrating work authorization from USCIS, (page 41);
  • Employers may accept documents bearing a different name than that which the employee has indicated in Section 1 of the Form I-9, so long as the documents reasonably relate to the employee.  The employer may want to attach a brief memo to the Form I-9 detailing the employee’s reason for the name discrepancy, including copies of any supporting documentation the employee chooses (but is not required) to provide, (pages 41-42);
  • Significantly more information is provided for employers in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI), including eight additional Q&As and pictures of sample documents that may be acceptable for Form I-9 purposes in the CNMI only (pages 48-49, 59).

For more information on the updated Employer Handbook or on potential changes to your Form I-9 policies and procedures, please contact your  immigration attorney.

USCIS Posts Suggestions from Stakeholders for Improving Form I-9

The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) recently published an Executive Summary of a listening session it hosted on November 2, 2010 regarding the Form I-9. The summary, which you can read in full here, attempts to capture stakeholders’ comments and concerns for how to improve the form itself and the overall I-9 process. There were many worthwhile suggestions that we hope USCIS will consider. The following is a list of the more interesting ideas with our comments.

Section 1: Employee Information and Verification

  • Make it clearer that providing the social security number is optional.

While this is a helpful suggestion, remember that an SSN is optional for completing the Form I-9 except when the employee will be subject to E-Verify. The USCIS website has an E-Verify Users Guide here, which details E-Verify requirements including those that impact the I-9 process.

  • Require employees who indicate that they are “an alien authorized to work” to specifically identify their status and classification on the form.

There is often great confusion about what employment eligibility documents employers can accept for certain foreign national employees, especially when you consider the complicated “receipt rules” that are outlined in the DHS I-9 Handbook (M-274).  For example, H-1B visa portability, Temporary Protected Status, as well as J-1 and F-1 employees, all have unique employment eligibility documents. Knowing the employee’s nonimmigrant status would provide at least a starting point for an employer to reference the M-274 to determine what’s acceptable. Along these lines, there is a critical need to update the Form I-9 List of Acceptable Documents to be inclusive of acceptable document types, including receipts and document combinations for special categories.

Section 2: Employer Review and Verification

  • Emphasize to employers that if an employee presents a satisfactory List A document, employers are not to request any additional documentation and are not to complete any portion of the List B or List C parts in this section.

One of the more common mistakes employers make is to “over document,” whereby the employee innocently presents a List B and/or List C document along with a List A document and the employer naively enters the information for all three. If you use reliable electronic I-9 software, your system should have built in I-9 compliance validations that prevent users from making this common mistake.

  • Strengthen the language in the instructions and add language to the certification section so that employers know that a representative of the company must be physically present when the employee presents the documents and signs the Form I-9 so the employer’s representative can attest to that fact.

Aside from helping employers realize this important and sometimes overlooked I-9 requirement, this suggestion could also help employers visualize what steps they need to take to obtain a properly completed Form I-9 for a new employee hired off-site.

Form I-9 Process

  • There should be guidance for employers on how to correct a form and specify who has the authority to correct what.

In an atmosphere of increased worksite enforcement, this is especially important given the frequency of I-9 audits conducted by Immigration and Custom Enforcement (ICE). Assessing whether your I-9 errors are substantive versus technical is a complex process, requiring analysis of various policy memoranda and case law. If you are facing a government audit, it’s always best to consult experienced legal counsel who can advise you on your potential I-9 liability and a prudent course of action.

These are just a few of the suggestions that came out of this session. You can find more information about the USCIS Office of Public Engagement (OPE), its outreach programs, and future Listening Sessions through their website.

Disclaimer: The content of this post does not constitute direct legal advice and is designed for informational purposes only. Information provided through this website should never replace the need for involving informed counsel on your employment and immigration issues.

Practical Implications of the DHS Final Rule on Electronic Form I-9 Signatures and Storage

guest blogger2

Editor’s Note: We are pleased to introduce two respected experts in the field of Immigration Law and I-9/E-Verify compliance as our guest bloggers for today’s post, Robert Loughran and Susan Kelly of FosterQuan, LLC. Their post continues our coverage of the DHS final electronic I-9 rule released last week.

On July 22, 2010, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published a final rule amending the June 2006 interim regulations relating to signatures and storage of electronic Forms I-9.  In light of this final rule, we wish to share with employers who have electronic Form I-9 verifications systems, or those employers who are considering moving to an electronic system, some of the practical implications that the final rule has on using an electronic system for Form I-9 completion and storage.

First, the final rule clarifies that the employer has three business days to complete Section 2 of the Form I-9, where information is recorded relating to the employee’s identity and work authorization, as well as the employee’s date of hire, the employer’s certification signature, and the business name and address.  This modification reduces the confusion previously created by the instruction that the form be completed “within three days.”  Thus, because the final rule makes clear that only business days will be counted, most employers need not count weekends or federal holidays when determine its Form I-9 completion deadlines.  Retailers and other similarly situated employers may still be held responsible for weekends and holidays if those days are ordinarily “days on which the employer conducts business” pursuant to 1997 INS guidance.

What the final rule does not address on this topic is when the clock starts on these three days.  Recent guidance from DHS’ U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) instructs employers not to count the day of hire as Day 1 in this calculation. Therefore, if an employee starts work on Monday, the third business day would be Thursday according to this recent interpretation.  Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE), the enforcement branch of DHS, has recognized this policy, albeit not in any officially published guidance.  Until there is consistent guidance relating to the three day clock, employers may want to take the more conservative approach of completing the Form I-9 within three days of hire, counting the first day of work as Day 1.

paper vs electronic

Paper or Plastic? or both?

Another point the final rule raises is that employers may use paper or electronic systems, or a combination of the two, for Form I-9 completion and storage.  This provides an employer with flexibility to use an electronic Form I-9 system in certain company locations while maintaining paper records in other locations.  In some instances, there may be remote hiring sites that do not have the logistics worked out for a company representative or agent to certify the genuine-ness of the documents being presented resources for an electronic Form I-9 system.  Those sites could continue using paper Forms I-9, and the company has the choice as to whether those paper Forms I-9 ultimately get stored in the electronic system.  For a variety of business and logistical reasons employers may elect to leave historic Forms I-9 for terminated employees in paper form and move forward electronically as they are able.  There also instances where independent business units are ready for electronic records at varying times, and this new rule reinforces the concept that the record keeping need not be simultaneously electronic company-wide.  Those paper forms could be filed and cataloged in cabinets or boxes according to the proper destruction date or they can be digitized, linked and calendared into HR software for electronic management at any time the employer chooses.

What is The Government Going to Want to See?detective

The final rule clarifies the audit trail requirements such that an electronic Form I-9 system need not include every time a Form I-9 is viewed or accessed, but it must track any:

  1. creation,
  2. completion,
  3. alteration,
  4. update, or
  5. other modification

of a Form I-9 by recording:

  1. the date of access,
  2. the identity of the individual taking the action, and
  3. the particular action taken.

Many of the leading electronic Form I-9 software tools are designed to create an audit trail compliant with these standards, but not all systems are created equally.  Form I-9 tools included in packages designed for other human resources functions may not have this level of sophistication.  Employers should ensure that any electronic system being used or considered meets this standard to ease the burden of creating such an audit trail manually.

Employers must ensure that their electronic Form I-9 storage method contains an indexing system that is comparable to a reasonable hardcopy filing system.  This standard replaces the former regulation requiring that the system permit searches by any data element in the Form I-9.  This deletion allows employers more flexibility in the cataloging of Form I-9 records.  Again, the more advanced software systems will generally allow searches by any data field, including the employee name, birth date or Social Security Number.  However, some employers may wish to store copies of all Form I-9s electronically in a simple .pdf format without using an electronic software for data entry.  So long as these electronically saved images of the Forms I-9 are indexed according to one or more reasonable data fields, the employer will be compliant with this standard.  The final rule also makes clear that these records may be stored in a separate Form I-9 file or as part of other employee records.

Can Paper Receipts Result in Carelessly Discarded Personal Data?

Lastly, DHS addressed the requirement that electronic Form I-9 systems be capable of printing a transaction record that must be given to the employee at the time of Form I-9 completion.  Commentators in the interim period argued that this requirement fundamentally undermines the conversion to a paper-less system, whereby paper resources are saved and data is safely secured in a centralized, secured location.  A transaction receipt akin to a copy of the Form I-9 itself circulates sensitive employee information that could be used for identify fraud.  DHS argued that the receipt allows for confirmation of the accuracy of the record and is a proactive defense for employers if errors are later discovered on the form.  It is interesting to note that DHS does not require that employees be given a receipt when a paper Form I-9 is completed, even though a paper Form I-9 is perhaps even more vulnerable to error as there are no data checks being performed.

DHS did modify the regulation in part, however, by only requiring that a receipt be provided when an employee requests it.  In addition, the receipt need not be issued at the time of the transaction so long as it is provided within a reasonable time, and it may be transmitted rather than printed.  Thus, the final rule greatly reduces the burden on employers and company resources to produce a receipt for every Form I-9 that is completed.  When requested by the employee, the employer may also send the receipt electronically via secured email, rather than print a paper copy that could be carelessly discarded, misplaced or otherwise fall into the wrong hands.  Because the final rule does not elaborate on the type of receipt that must be provided, employers may consider drafting a receipt for company use as an alternative to printing a copy of the Form I-9.  A receipt that provides the employee name, date of completion and certification that all information entered was true and correct could satisfy the receipt rule without opening the door to identity fraud and scrutiny of company hiring practices.  Like all Form I-9 practices, consistency is crucial, and any policies should be adopted company-wide for all employees.

E-Verify Redesign Coming June 13

USCIS has announced that on June 13th it will launch its redesigned E-Verify website which seeks to offer “a clean and modern design, easy and intuitive navigation, and clear and simple language.” As we previously reported, the most significant changes that you can expect to see include a new home page, case alert functionality, verification screen, and case management features. Let’s take a look at some of the new features that E-Verify users will want to know about in order to prepare for these changes.

Home Page

The modifications to the home page are by far an improvement over the existing interface. As shown in the image below, quick links are now offered to start a new case, update existing cases, or view case alerts. The navigation pane on the left-hand side has also been modified, although the overall functionality is the same.

Home_PageAs mentioned in our earlier post, it’s questionable as to how appropriate the E-Verify work authorization expiration reminder is since you may not create a new case in E-Verify to re-verify an employee. Rather, all reverification must be done on the Form I-9.

Creating, Verifying and Closing a Case

When creating a new case, you will notice the data entry screen where information goes from the employee’s authorization documents now closely resembles the Form I-9 layout. In an effort to reduce the chances of common formatting errors, improvements to the interface have been made such as a segmented Social Security number field and drop-down boxes for all date fields.VerifyEmployee

The status of a case now displays at the top of the screen. Note that you can still access the entire case history by selecting the “View/Print Case Details” link that is located at the top right of the page.

You will also notice that the case status screen now only displays the last four digits of a Social Security number for added privacy and security. The full Social Security number will continue to be included on TNC notices and referral letters since the employee should verify the number for accuracy.Case_Results

Once E-Verify displays the final results, you are two steps away from closing a case. First, click the green “Close Case” button and then indicate whether or not the employee whose case you are closing still works for the company. Then, E-Verify will offer new closure statement options for you to choose from based upon whether or not the employee continues to work for the company and the disposition of the case.

Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)

Program Administrators for companies enrolled as employers or designated agents can view their signed MOUs by clicking on “Edit Company Profile” in the left menu. Then click the green “View MOU” button at the bottom of the page.  MOU signature pages that were submitted by fax are not available for download.

Simplified Terms

Finally, USCIS has simplified some of the language used across the E-Verify system. This is a welcomed change.  As noted in the chart below, USCIS is going for more intuitive and simple terms.

Old Term New Term
Initiate (or run) a query Create a case
Photo tool Photo matching
Request additional verification Request name review
Exit Log out
Resolve case Close case
a
a

NOTE: USCIS has cautioned that they could not update everything all at once. Old terms may linger on some web pages and publications until USCIS allocates the time and resources necessary to update them with their replacements.

You can view the new E-Verify Redesign section of the E-Verify website here.

USCIS Hosts Employment Eligibility Verification Forum

On Monday May 3, the USCIS hosted a Listening Session to serve as a public venue for providing feedback and input to the USCIS Verification Division, which is responsible for administering both the Form I-9 and the E-Verify program. We participated in the meeting telephonically. In our effort to help you stay informed of the ever changing employment verification landscape, the following is a summary of the more interesting highlights.

The Numbers

  • Over 200,000 employers have registered for E-Verify to date, about half of which were required to do so in order to comply with Federal or State regulations.
  • Nearly 800,000 worksites out of an approximate 7 million in the U.S. have been registered with E-Verify (about 8.75%).
  • On average, about 1,000 new companies enroll with E-Verify per week.

Upcoming Changes to E-Verify

  • The look and feel of E-Verify could be changing soon. USCIS expects to roll out redesigned features for improved ease of use in an effort to help reduce common mistakes. Specific release dates were not confirmed, however, it was mentioned on the call that several upgrades could be expected as early as June.
  • USCIS is continuing to work on ways to expand the image library used by the photo matching tool. 
  • USCIS acknowledged that they are working on a new E-Verify feature that will allow for receipt information to be entered into the system. 

Self-Check

  • Scheduled for release in December, the proposed E-Verify Self-Check program would permit individuals to pre-screen themselves, allowing them to verify their status before applying for a new job.
  • Employers would presumably be unable to prescreen candidates through Self-Check.
  • USCIS warned that any employer who would require a potential employee to perform a Self Check would be in abuse of the system.

On a final note, USCIS confirmed that the Puerto Rican birth certificate law scheduled to go into effect on July 1st effectively invalidates all previously issued Puerto Rican birth certificates for I-9 purposes as we reported a few weeks ago. USCIS stated that additional guidance on this front is forthcoming.

You can find more information about the USCIS Office of Public Engagement (OPE), its outreach programs, and future Listening Sessions through their website. We realize many of our readers have busy schedules and are unable to participate in OPE public events, which is precisely why we plan to attend and report on future sessions relevant to E-Verify and I-9. Stay tuned!

Disclaimer: The content of this post does not constitute direct legal advice and is designed for informational purposes only. Information provided through this website should never replace the need for involving informed counsel on your employment and immigration issues